Today was the last Monday of class. Once again, I slinked
out of bed and headed to the dining hall for breakfast. I’ve gotten to a point
where I’ve figured out what’s good and what’s not in the cafeteria. Today I had
a delicious breakfast. A fresh bagel and a delicious bowl of yogurt started my
day off right.
We headed to class and started reviewing the court cases of
the weekend. These cases focused of the limits of the 4th Amendment.
In each case, the defendant argued that the police violated their 4th
Amendment rights by finding incriminating evidence without a warrant. In one
case a policeman, suspecting someone to grow marijuana, flew a plane over a
house to verify is suspicions. The Supreme Court ruled that the officer had the
right to do this. In another similar case, the Supreme Court ruled that a
police officer was not allowed to use a thermal camera to view the heat set off
by the lights used to grow marijuana plants in someone’s attic.
The other cases involved unreasonable searches of people’s homes.
In one case, a man was arrested for something, but the police found
incriminating evidence on the basis of another crime. The police searched the
man’s home without a warrant and found stolen stereo and television equipment.
The court ruled that the officers did not have the right to do this on the
basis that evidence found without a warrant must be in plain sight of the
officers. In yet another case, a man was arrested for robbing a coin shop. The
police searched the man’s entire house without a warrant and found tons of
incriminating evidence. The evidence, however, was discarded because it was
found without a warrant.
The 4th Amendment is very tricky to interpret. On
one hand, a person’s right to privacy should be respected. America was created
with this intention. On the other hand, if a police officer finds incriminating
evidence without a warrant, a guilty person may go free. It’s a tough line to
draw and I’m happy that I don’t have to do it.
In the afternoon session, we discussed how terrorists are
treated in America. If someone is suspected of terrorist activities, their 14th
Amendment rights are often set aside. Suspected terrorists are often detained
indefinitely and have no promise of a speedy trial. I believe that this is
incredibly unfair. A suspect is a suspect, it doesn’t matter what they are
accused of. The basic principle of American law enforcement is that someone is
innocent until proven guilty. It is horrible that America doesn’t allow these
terrorist suspects the same rights as others.
No comments:
Post a Comment